Facilitation and interference effects in a Stroop-like task: evidence in favor of semantic processing of parafoveally-presented stimuli.
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this study we used a modified Stroop word-color task in which the target was a centrally fixated color frame and the distractor was an incompatible, compatible or non-color word. In Experiment 1 distractors were located either within (the inside condition) or outside the frame, at distances of 1.3 deg (near-outside condition) or 2 deg (far-outside condition). In Experiment 2 only the inside and the far conditions were used. The stimuli were on the screen for 150 msec (Experiment 1) or 50 msec (Experiment 2). A non-distractor condition was also included. In Experiment 1, incompatible distractors interfered with naming target colors, and this effect disappeared when the distractor was located far from the target. However, facilitation from compatible distractors was reliable in the farther location. These results were replicated in Experiment 2. The data suggest that (1) unattended items are processed semantically; (2) that facilitation and interference from words in color naming tasks can be caused by different mechanisms; and (3) that distractors are processed differently according to whether they are near or far from fixation.
منابع مشابه
Neuropsychological Decomposing Stroop Interference Into Different Cognitive Monitoring; An Exploratory Factor Analysis
Introduction: There are two alternative explanations of the Stroop phenomenon. Several studies have revealed that the difference in performance on congruent and incongruent trials can arise from response interference. On the contrary, many authors have claimed that Stroop interference might occur at earlier processing stages related to semantic or conceptual encoding. The present study aims to ...
متن کاملAssessing stimulus-stimulus (semantic) conflict in the Stroop task using saccadic two-to-one color response mapping and preresponse pupillary measures.
Conflict in the Stroop task is thought to come from various stages of processing, including semantics. Two-to-one response mappings, in which two response-set colors share a common response location, have been used to isolate stimulus-stimulus (semantic) from stimulus-response conflict in the Stroop task. However, the use of congruent trials as a baseline means that the measured effects could b...
متن کاملIs one enough? The case for non-additive influences of visual features on crossmodal Stroop interference
When different perceptual signals arising from the same physical entity are integrated, they form a more reliable sensory estimate. When such repetitive sensory signals are pitted against other competing stimuli, such as in a Stroop Task, this redundancy may lead to stronger processing that biases behavior toward reporting the redundant stimuli. This bias would therefore, be expected to evoke g...
متن کاملColor Me Surprised: Stimulus-Specific Differences in Stroop Interference
The Stroop Effect is the decreased accuracy and increased response times observed when participants are asked to indicate the printed color of a word that is itself a conflicting or incongruous color-word (respond “blue” to RED printed in blue), compared to color-naming of congruous words or control stimuli (BLUE or XXXX respectively, both printed in blue). Congruous trials (matching word color...
متن کاملColor Me Surprised: Stimulus-Specific Differences in Stroop Interference
The Stroop Effect is the decreased accuracy and increased response times observed when participants are asked to indicate the printed color of a word that is itself a conflicting or incongruous color-word (respond “blue” to RED printed in blue), compared to color-naming of congruous words or control stimuli (BLUE or XXXX respectively, both printed in blue). Congruous trials (matching word color...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Acta psychologica
دوره 84 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1993